I wrote something about remakes a little while ago and how I can get conflicted about seeing the new versions of films at times. It got me thinking every time I saw a movie based off of a novel when I was kid I always heard someone say, "The book is better." I used to think they were trying to be brainy or overly critical because they beat me to a story that is going to be popular some how. Then I read a book or two that became movies and found myself saying;"The book is better". Is it always better though? The reason I am writing this, is because a movie is going to come out soon based on Max Brook's World War Z . I read his earlier book, The Zombie Survival Guide and I thought it was funny, original (at the time), and the reports at the end of it were pretty good short stories. They were good enough that the format was used for the basis of his next book, the soon to be film World War Z ....
There's a jungle of content out there. Let me handle the writing for you.